Legislative Update: West Virginia legislature may give employers more time to cut final paycheck

Pend­ing West Vir­ginia leg­is­la­tion would, if passed, extend the time employ­ers have to issue a ter­mi­nat­ed employ­ee’s final pay­check, from the cur­rent 72 hours after dis­charge to the next reg­u­lar pay day.

On Jan­u­ary 28, 2011, Sen­a­tors Palum­bo and Klem­pa intro­duced Sen­ate Bill 339, which is being referred to the Labor and Finance Com­mit­tees. You can keep track of the progress of the bill by going to the Bill Sta­tus page and enter­ing 339 in the “Enter Bill Num­ber” field. For infor­ma­tion on the bill’s spon­sors, or on any oth­er mem­bers of the Sen­ate, you can go to the Sen­ate Mem­bers page and pick the mem­ber from a drop-down list.

Sen­ate Bill 339 would amend the WV Wage Pay­ment and Col­lec­tion Act, which deals in part with the oblig­a­tion of an employ­er to issue a final pay­check to an employ­ee with­in a cer­tain peri­od of time.  The Wage Pay­ment and Col­lec­tion Act cur­rent­ly sets two dif­fer­ent dead­lines, depend­ing on whether the employ­ee resigned or was dis­charged.

  • Sec­tion 21–5‑4(b): If an employ­ee is dis­charged, the employ­er must pay the employ­ee all earned wages with­in 72 hours after the discharge.
  • Sec­tion 21–5‑4©: if the employ­ee resigns, the employ­er must pat the employ­ee all earned wages by the next reg­u­lar pay­day, either through “reg­u­lar chan­nels” or, if the employ­ee requests, by mail. There is this addi­tion­al vari­a­tion where the employ­ee resigns: if the employ­ee pro­vides “at least one pay period’s notice of inten­tion to quit”, then the employ­er must pay the employ­ee all earned wages “at the time of quit­ting” (which is the final day worked after giv­ing notice).

Sen­ate Bill 339 is sim­ple in what it does: it elim­i­nates the dis­tinc­tion between vol­un­tary res­ig­na­tion and invol­un­tary dis­charge, and would extend the dis­charge time peri­od (now 72 hours) to the next reg­u­lar pay­day. So under Sen­ate Bill 339, employ­ers would have to pay sep­a­rat­ed the employ­ee all earned wages by the next reg­u­lar pay­day, regard­less of whether the employ­ee resigned or was discharged.

Here is the marked up lan­guage of sec­tion 21–5‑4(b) in Sen­ate Bill 339 to show you exact­ly how the sec­tion will bee change, if the bill becomes law:

When­ev­er a per­son, firm or cor­po­ra­tion dis­charges an employ­ee, such the per­son, firm or cor­po­ra­tion shall pay the employ­ee’s wages in full with­in sev­en­ty-two hours no lat­er than the next reg­u­lar pay­day through the reg­u­lar pay chan­nels or by mail if request­ed by the employ­ee.

Part of the sig­nif­i­cance of this pro­posed change is the poten­tial penal­ty that applies if an employ­er fails to issue final pay checks to depart­ing employ­ee by the dead­lines set out in the Wage Pay­ment and Col­lec­tion Act. Sec­tion 21–5‑4(e) states that an employ­er that fails to meet one of these dead­lines in issu­ing a final check is liable to the employ­ee for “liq­ui­dat­ed dam­ages” in the addi­tion­al amount (above and beyond the earned wages) for three times the unpaid amount. So if an employ­er owes a dis­charged employ­ee final wages of $5,000, and the employ­er fails to pay that amount with­in 72 hours (or by the next reg­u­lar pay­day under Sen­ate Bill 339), then the employ­er owes the employ­ee an addi­tion­al $15,000, for a total of $20,000. The Act also allows the award of attor­neys’ fees and expens­es incurred by the employ­ee in col­lect­ing the unpaid wages. Sen­ate Bill 339 does not elim­i­nate this liq­ui­dat­ed dam­age lia­bil­i­ty, but it gives the employ­er the same dead­line for issu­ing the final pay­check, regard­less of whether the employ­ee resigned or was discharged.

When there is any progress in the leg­is­la­ture on Sen­ate Bill 339, I’ll update you on this blog.

Drew M. Capuder
Fol­low me:
Lat­est posts by Drew M. Capud­er (see all)

Leave a Reply