Category Archives: Age Discrimination

Blog articles on: Age discrimination under either the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (29 USC 621) or the West Virginia Human Rights Act of 1967 (W. Va. Code 5-11-1). Here is a list of our blog articles on this category:

Fifth Circuit applies hostile work environment to age claims

Courts have some­times ques­tioned whether hos­tile work envi­ron­ment claims apply to all “fla­vors” of dis­crim­i­na­tion. Hos­tile work envi­ron­ment claims most fre­quently arise in claims of sex dis­crim­i­na­tion  and race dis­crim­i­na­tion claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of … Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in Age Discrimination, Constructive discharge, Hostile work environment, Result for Employee, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 | Leave a comment

Cleveland jury awards $900,000 against hospital in age discrimination case

Ellen Simon, an attor­ney in Cleve­land who authors the excel­lent blog, Ellen Simon’s Employee Rights Post, recently tried an age dis­crim­i­na­tion claim for plain­tiff Glo­ria Parks (a phle­botomist) against Cleveland’s Uni­ver­sity Hos­pi­tals Case Med­ical Cen­ter. Ms. Parks had worked for … Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in Age Discrimination, Back and Front Pay Issues, Emotional Distress Damages, Evidence issues, Liquidated damages, Medical Industry Litigation, Result for Employee | Leave a comment

Charleston, WV Jury Awards $1.7m in Age Discrimination Case, 10–1-09

On Octo­ber 1, 2009, a jury in Charleston, Kanawha County, West Vir­ginia returned a ver­dict in an age dis­crim­i­na­tion case, award­ing James Nagy a total of $1,750,450. The Law­suit James Nagy filed suit in Charleston in March 2008 against West … Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in Age Discrimination, Back and Front Pay Issues, Emotional Distress Damages, Jury verdicts, Punitive damages, Result for Employee, WV Human Rights Act | Leave a comment

Fourth Circuit rules that pension contribution rules may be age biased

The Fourth Cir­cuit Court of Appeals, in an unpub­lished opin­ion, addressed whether an employer’s pen­sion con­tri­bu­tion rules may con­sti­tute age dis­crim­i­na­tion under the Age Dis­crim­i­na­tion in Employ­ment Act of 1967, in Equal Employ­ment Oppor­tu­nity Com­mis­sion v. Bal­ti­more County, –F.3d. — … Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in Age Discrimination, Federal Cases (but not US Supreme Court), Fourth Circuit, Pension issues, Summary Judgment | Leave a comment

Jackson County jury awards $2.1 million in age case

On March 17, 2010, a jury in Jack­son County in West Vir­ginia awarded Jerold John Rice Jr. roughly $2.1 mil­lion in an age dis­crim­i­na­tion case against The Burke-Parsons-Bowlby Cor­po­ra­tion, Stella-Jones US Hold­ings Cor­po­ra­tion, and Stella-Jones, Inc., tried in Judge Thomas … Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in Age Discrimination, Attorney's Fees, Back and Front Pay Issues, Emotional Distress Damages, Jury verdicts, Punitive damages, Result for Employee, WV Human Rights Act | Leave a comment

Arbitration Agreements in Union Contacts are Enforceable; US Supreme Court in Penn Plaza v. Pyett

This is a test Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in Age Discrimination, Arbitration, Labor Unions, Pending legislation, Result for Employer, US Supreme Court | 2 Comments

Supreme Court “fills in the blank” to recognize retaliation claims for federal employees under ADEA; Gomez-Perez v. Potter, 2008

5–27–08: The US Supreme Court in Gomez-Perez v. Pot­ter, 128 S. Ct. 1931 (2008) ruled that the Age Dis­crim­i­na­tion in Employ­ment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., pro­hib­ited retal­i­a­tion against fed­eral employ­ees who had com­plained about age … Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in Age Discrimination, Result for Employee, Retaliation claims, US Supreme Court | 1 Comment

US Supreme Court broadens scope of permissible evidence for proving discrimination; Sprint/United Management v. Mendelsohn; 2/26/08

Feb­ru­ary 26, 2008: The United States Supreme Court handed down its opin­ion in Sprint/United Man­age­ment Co. v. Mendel­sohn, 128 S. Ct. 1140 (2008) (Find­Law site opin­ion). The issue in this fed­eral age dis­crim­i­na­tion case (ADEA) was whether the plain­tiff could … Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in Age Discrimination, Evidence issues, Result for Employee, US Supreme Court | 3 Comments