Category Archives: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Fifth Circuit applies hostile work environment to age claims

Courts have some­times ques­tioned whether hos­tile work envi­ron­ment claims apply to all “fla­vors” of dis­crim­i­na­tion. Hos­tile work envi­ron­ment claims most fre­quently arise in claims of sex dis­crim­i­na­tion  and race dis­crim­i­na­tion claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of … Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in Age Discrimination, Constructive discharge, Hostile work environment, Result for Employee, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 | Leave a comment

US Supreme Court Rules for Employee on “Cat’s Paw” Theory

The United States Supreme Court recently unan­i­mously issued a major vic­tory for employ­ees under “USERRA”, the Uni­formed Ser­vices Employ­ment and Reem­ploy­ment Rights Act of 1994, 38 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq., on the “cat’s paw” the­ory in employ­ment dis­crim­i­na­tion claims. … Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in Evidence issues, Medical Industry Litigation, Result for Employee, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, US Supreme Court, USERRA | Tagged | Leave a comment

Single act may create hostile work environment, according to Seventh Circuit in Berry v. Chicago Transit Authority

A few days ago, I posted my arti­cle on PAR Elec­tri­cal Con­trac­tors, Inc. v. Bev­elle , in which the West Vir­ginia Supreme Court ruled that a sin­gle episode involv­ing mul­ti­ple uses of the N-word could cre­ate a racially hos­tile work … Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in Hostile work environment, Prompt remedial action, Result for Employee, Sex Discrimination, Sexual harassment, Summary Judgment, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 | Leave a comment

Can you be sexually harassed behind your back?

It might be obvi­ous, but it seems a bit dif­fi­cult to win on a claim for sex­ual harass­ment where all of the harass­ment occurs behind your back (and by “behind your back”, I mean sit­u­a­tions where the harass­ing behav­ior occurs … Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in Federal Cases (but not US Supreme Court), Fourth Circuit, Hostile work environment, Medical Industry Litigation, Result for Employer, Sexual harassment, Summary Judgment, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Analysis: The “No Blood No Foul” Rule. When is an Employer’s Conduct Severe Enough to Constitute Retaliation?

I pre­vi­ously wrote about the Supreme Court’s retal­i­a­tion deci­sion in Burling­ton North­ern & Sante Fe Rail­way Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53 (2006) (“Burling­ton North­ern v. White”), in which the US Supreme Court sub­stan­tially broad­ened the abil­ity of employ­ees to … Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in Result for Employee, Retaliation claims, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, US Supreme Court | Tagged | 1 Comment

US Supreme Court rules pay claims must be filed shortly after discriminatory decision; Ledbetter v Goodyear, 5/29/07

May 29, 2007: In Led­bet­ter v. Goodyear Tire & Rub­ber Com­pany, 550 U.S. 618, 128 S. Ct. 2162 (2007) (Find­Law site opin­ion), the United States Supreme Court, in a 5–4 deci­sion, issued an impor­tant deci­sion in a sex dis­crim­i­na­tion case … Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in Disparate Impact, Equal Pay, Limitations periods, Result for Employer, Sex Discrimination, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, US Legislation, US Supreme Court | Leave a comment