Tag Archives: Slider

US Supreme Court Rules for Employee on “Cat’s Paw” Theory

The United States Supreme Court recently unan­i­mously issued a major vic­tory for employ­ees under “USERRA”, the Uni­formed Ser­vices Employ­ment and Reem­ploy­ment Rights Act of 1994, 38 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq., on the “cat’s paw” the­ory in employ­ment dis­crim­i­na­tion claims. … Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in Evidence issues, Medical Industry Litigation, Result for Employee, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, US Supreme Court, USERRA | Tagged | Leave a comment

Sorry boss, I didn’t know you were having sex in the office!!

The West Vir­ginia Supreme Court recently issued an opin­ion deal­ing with one of those stereo­typ­i­cally awk­ward sit­u­a­tions, where an employee allegedly stum­bles into a room where the boss is hav­ing sex with a co-worker. The deci­sion was  Roth v. DeFe­lice­Care, … Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in Harless wrongful discharge, Hostile work environment, Intentional infliction of emotional distress, Medical Industry Litigation, Pleading requirements, Result for Employee, Retaliation claims, Sex Discrimination, Sexual harassment, WV Human Rights Act, WV Supreme Court | Tagged | 1 Comment

Was the boss “merely crude”, or was he sexually harassing her?

Sex­ual harass­ment claims fre­quently require judges and juries to dis­tin­guish between “merely crude” behav­ior, which doesn’t vio­late the employee’s rights, and “sex­ual harass­ment”, which does. The Fourth Cir­cuit Court of Appeals addressed that issue in EEOC v. Fair­brook Med­ical Clinic, … Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in Federal Cases (but not US Supreme Court), Fourth Circuit, Medical Industry Litigation, Result for Employee, Sexual harassment, Summary Judgment | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Analysis: The “No Blood No Foul” Rule. When is an Employer’s Conduct Severe Enough to Constitute Retaliation?

I pre­vi­ously wrote about the Supreme Court’s retal­i­a­tion deci­sion in Burling­ton North­ern & Sante Fe Rail­way Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53 (2006) (“Burling­ton North­ern v. White”), in which the US Supreme Court sub­stan­tially broad­ened the abil­ity of employ­ees to … Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in Result for Employee, Retaliation claims, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, US Supreme Court | Tagged | 1 Comment